Are Hoover Platinum Vacuum Cleaners Far better Than Dyson Vacuums?
You're right in the middle of vacuuming your living room and smoke starts pouring out the side of your vacuum cleaner. The next day you visit the vacuum repair shop along with the technician tells you that that the repair of your antiquated vacuum is going to cost you two hundred dollars. At this point you choose to get new, but which vacuum is the very best buy for the dollars? The two most common brands of vacuum cleaners in the marketplace are Dyson and Hoover, but which is greater. Three variables to consider when buying a vacuum cleaner are price, capabilities, performance and durability.
The primary distinction between Hoover and Dyson vacuum cleaners is price point. Dyson vacuum cleaners have often been recognized to be higher priced than Hoover claiming that you get far more vacuum and higher performance for the cash. The present Dyson price point for a vacuum cleaner ranges from just under four hundred dollars to the just under six hundred dollars with seven different models to pick from.
Hoover on the other hand has over thirty five upright units ranging from sixty dollars to just under four hundred dollars for the top of the line Hoover platinum series upright. When considering what to pay for a vacuum I always look at the warranty. The warranty is usually a good indication of how firmly the manufacturer believes within the vacuum cleaner it's selling. With Hoover's new Platinum line Hoover has increased their warranty to six years giving the platinum line of vacuums an extra year over Dyson. Inside the region of warranty and price Hoover beats out Dyson hands down.
The capability of a vacuum cleaner needs to be matched to the tasks it has to perform along with the environment the vacuum cleaner is going to be used in. For people with multi level homes a lighter vacuum cleaner must be used for ease of carrying it from level to level. Individuals that use a vacuum cleaner for cleaning drapery or baseboard areas need to take a look at a vacuum cleaner that has a plethora of vacuum tools, extended wand length and lots of accessory tools. In Dyson's case all of their upright vacuums come with a detachable wand and tools designed for other cleaning tasks. In Hoover's case they the Platinum Lightweight bagged upright does not have a detachable wand, but do come with an additional little canister vacuum to compliment the upright.
Even though Hoover gives you an upright and a canister vacuum all the inside the same box I discovered that having to use two vacuums rather than 1 unit took not only additional time but also extra storage space. Hoover recently introduced their version of a cyclonic upright called the UH70015. This vacuum cleaner comes with an aluminum lightweight wand, stretchable eight foot hose and dusting brush. Both manufactures products do a great job in fulfilling all of the tasks that a vacuum cleaner has to perform but for ease of use Dyson makes cleaning a pleasurable experience. Dyson Vacuum cleaners seem be one step ahead of Hoover for maneuverability along with the refinement in both looks and engineering.
Within the vacuum world cyclonic technology appears to be a synonym for increased performance, but how a lot better is the cyclonic vacuum over its predecessors. Having professionally reviewed over forty distinct vacuum cleaners and working within the wholesale cleaning business for over 15 years I do see that the cyclonic vacuum does have its advantages. A cyclonic vacuum seems to suck up far more debris from baseboard areas and has much more retention of dirt around the brush area on tough surface floors. On the other hand the power of a cyclonic vacuum can cause havoc on delicate materials including cotton. Rug edges also appear to pose a problem by acquiring a lot more quickly sucked up by a cyclonic over conventional vacuums cleaner. When looking at performance be careful to take a look at the areas that you might be vacuuming and match its power to the kinds of materials you are going to clean.
When you're thinking of paying a high price for a vacuum cleaner, durability is always a concern. If you take a look at the life of a vacuum cleaner versus the price you're paying, the top end Dyson would cost you one hundred and twenty dollars a year if the vacuum cleaner lasts five years or the life of its warranty. In Hoover's case, if the Platinum Cyclonic had been to last you six years, or the life of its warranty you would be paying sixty seven dollars a year. Looking at the durability of higher end retail vacuums I would base its life expectancy on the warranty of the unit. Most higher priced vacuums price far more to repair, and within the case of catastrophic failure you would be much better to discard the vacuum than to have it repaired. For this reason I would often base the life expectancy of a higher end vacuum of the length of the warranty. With the exception of the vacuum cleaner being broken by owner neglect the vacuum cleaner need to price extremely little to fix with the assistance of the warranty covering most of the bill.
Overall if you're looking to save some funds and get a new vacuum cleaner each and every five or six years the Hoover Platinum Cyclonic seems to be the better buy. With just under two hundred dollars in savings the Hoover unit has a far better warranty and will perform the same tasks as Dyson's most expensive vacuum. Dyson does have some other features including ball technology which enables the user to maneuver the vacuum for efficiently. If you're seeking these kinds of features Dyson's lineup may be far better suited to your wants.